I had known about The Invisible Man, by H.G. Wells. In elementary (grade) school, the big three were: The Invisible Man, Dracula, and Frankenstein. I had not heard of The War of the Worlds, and was also not aware that Wells wrote this one as well.
A handful of years later, I was introduced to old time radio - various companies made popular radio shows from the 1930's and 1940's available on cassette tape: Abbot and Costello, Burns and Allen, Fibber McGee and Molly, The Shadow, The Green Hornet, etc. Eventually, I came across the original Mercury Theater broadcast of The War of the Worlds that starred Orson Welles, and found it interesting that the live broadcast apparently fooled some listeners into believing the Earth was really being invaded by Martians. The style of the program contributed to this - the earlier portion of it had sections of a radio journalist interviewing people at the crash site that would have sounded convincing enough. That is, until you listed to the program further, and heard the narration of Orson Welles himself. I remember the closing of the broadcast included an apology for alarming anyone.
While listening, I found it interesting how much the radio show differed from the film - it followed the book more closely (well, that's much easier on radio, isn't it?). While I found it interesting, I also found it on the slow side, bordering on boring. I prefer the George Pal film version much more, and I feel the filmmakers made some choices which make the story more effective from a visual standpoint (in much the same way that The Wizard of Oz differs from the book).
What were some of the things that made the film more effective for me?
The "manta" |
As described in the novel |
From the film |
A few elements which are missing from the George Pal film are featured prominently in the 2005 remake made by Steven Spielberg. First, what the martians do with captured humans - they are certainly captured and carried in baskets behind the tripods. Second, the fast growing "red weed", which we do see in the film, without any real explanation of what it is. While these scenes from the novel are present, they are somewhat difficult to decipher what is really going on.
The War of the Worlds remains one of my favorite 20th century science fiction films - far superior to many films that were made decades later with incredibly inferior special effects and stories. It wasn't until many years later that I learned that George Pal was responsible for many other classic science fiction films - The Time Machine, 7 Faces of Dr. Lao, and Destination Moon (based on Rocket Ship Galileo by Robert A. Heinlein) to name a few.
If you have never seen it, you should.
Any other big fans of this film out there?
Great review. I remember when I saw the film for the first time it was in a theater and a re-release and what I most remember about it was that it was LOUD especially towards the end. The other thing I remember about it was the incredible (to me) scenes of crowd panic. I couldn't imagine something like that happening at the time.
ReplyDeleteLOUD...and then things started to get very quiet. Thanks for the comment!
Delete